Among traders and a certain segment of the political set there is a bizarre gold fetish that is driven by some deep and dark paranoia. Much of this fascination –and in my view The Gold Bubble—is driven by the candidacy of Ron Paul and the pseudo-econo science propagated by his supporters.
Gold bugs love to argue that the industrialized world is on the eve of a period of catastrophic hyperinflation and ultimately a worthless US dollar. No matter the economic malaise we face the gold bugs always see hyperinflation as the outcome –I have yet to figure out how a depression is inflationary, but surely any true gold evangelist has a chart that can indicate just such an outcome.
Matthew O’Brien with The Atlantic has a great article debunking the gold bug arguments and provides a tour through the history of the economics of hyperinflation:
How are the United States' historic budget deficits, money-printing and depressed economy any different from the country's that have experienced hyper-inflation? The three-part answer is: (1) we don't have any problems selling our debt; (2) we aren't actually printing money; and (3) the United States is a highly productive economy that is nothing like bombed-out Budapest.
For those that can’t end an economics conversation without mentioning Weimar O’Brien offers this suggestion:
Let's conclude with a modest proposal for an economic corollary to Godwin's Law. The first person to reference Weimar's hyperinflation in an economic debate automatically loses.
Be sure to read The Altantic for this entire article.