Chatter

As we enter the silly season of the presidential election cycle desperate candidates are willing to try anything to capture the support of voters. One of the recent ridiculous statements came from Mr.Gingrich –who is no stranger to absurd promises—when he assured voters that gasoline prices would plummet to $2.50 during his presidency.

UBS’s Jonathan Golub crafted the chart on the right comparing the earnings per share of the technology sector with and without Apple. The market looks outstanding with Apple’s performance factored in but sans Apple and we see much flatter performance across the technology space.

In Golub's February calculation, the S&P 500's Q1 2012 earnings were on track to rise 6.8% with Apple (AAPL), but would shrivel to 2.8% without.

"By stripping away that one single company," Golub told the Wall Street Journal, "it is like seeing light through a prism — you see things more clearly."

No wonder bulls want to see Apple reach $1,000 a share! Once the music stops and Apple falls the entire market must acclimate to the reality that earnings are still weak and growth remains stagnant.

Among traders and a certain segment of the political set there is a bizarre gold fetish that is driven by some deep and dark paranoia. Much of this fascination –and in my view The Gold Bubble—is driven by the candidacy of Ron Paul and the pseudo-econo science propagated by his supporters.

Gold bugs love to argue that the industrialized world is on the eve of a period of catastrophic hyperinflation and ultimately a worthless US dollar. No matter the economic malaise we face the gold bugs always see hyperinflation as the outcome –I have yet to figure out how a depression is inflationary, but surely any true gold evangelist has a chart that can indicate just such an outcome.

Matthew O’Brien with The Atlantic has a great article debunking the gold bug arguments and provides a tour through the history of the economics of hyperinflation:

How are the United States' historic budget deficits, money-printing and depressed economy any different from the country's that have experienced hyper-inflation? The three-part answer is: (1) we don't have any problems selling our debt; (2) we aren't actually printing money; and (3) the United States is a highly productive economy that is nothing like bombed-out Budapest.

For those that can’t end an economics conversation without mentioning Weimar O’Brien offers this suggestion:

Let's conclude with a modest proposal for an economic corollary to Godwin's Law. The first person to reference Weimar's hyperinflation in an economic debate automatically loses.

Be sure to read The Altantic for this entire article.

Corporate executives are not all that different from dictators according to game theorist Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. A successful CEO must assemble a winning coalition on his board of directors –the smaller it is, the better for the CEO—and he must adequately reward his coalition for their support. Corporate rewards can come in two broad varieties: public goods that all parties share (eg: increased earnings and dividends) and private goods that only select individuals receive (eg: increased remuneration for serving on the board of directors). Additionally a successful CEO will want to handpick his board of directors and make sure his picks understand they are replaceable with someone else should they deviate from the CEO’s best interests.

Apple is a fine company that crafts highly valued products and sells them at a premium price to very loyal customers. The company’s gifted leadership spent more than a decade cultivating a culture and corporate vision that made this wonderful growth possible. That being said, AAPL is and has been in a bubble for a while now and the outrageous size of that bubble jeopardizes the performance of the entire market.

I'm a 28 year old man that lives in the city of Richmond, why does LivingSocial think I'm a good prospect for two nights at a local bed and breakfast plus cupcakes? LivingSocial surely has a lot of information about me: My demographics, my purchasing preferences and whether or not I am opening their emails and clicking anything. So with this vast array of useful information they are sending me emails --essentially spam-- that I am not going to read and may even contribute to a loss of permission to deliver emails to me. How does this business model continue? When will the venture capital money cease for this kind of foolish business?

Punk Economics breaks down all the players in the ongoing European Debtbacle with this entertaining animation:

Privatized profits and socialized risk! That’s the economic theme these days according to Nouriel Roubini’s outstanding book Crisis Economics. The subprime mortgage debacle, the credit bubble & crunch and the ensuing recession were predominantly resolved by bailing out powerful “too big to fail” financial institutions. When times are good these institutions take advantage of the power of leverage to enjoy immense profits and reward executives & shareholders handsomely. When times are bad leverage works just as powerfully in reverse and is incredibly destructive.

Roubini argues that the subprime mortgage debacle and resulting bailouts –while essential to preserve the financial system and avert a depression—were inherently unfair and shifted the burden of the losses from the balance sheets of banks and onto the balance sheets of governments. Consequently the bad debts of banks have not disappeared but rather have been appended to those of national governments. At the same time, extremely large financial institutions have learned a valuable lesson from their mistakes – stay too big to fail and the government will always come to the rescue to save the day. Roubini argues that this state of moral hazard will result in further excessive risk taking by banks and result in yet another cycle of debacles.

Algorithmic expert Kevin Slavin recently spoke at TED and offers some insights on the robots that oversee the majority of the liquid assets in global markets.

Algorithmic trading evolved in part because institutional traders have the same problems that the United States Air Force had, which is that they're moving these positions -- whether it's Proctor & Gamble or Accenture, whatever -- they're moving a million shares of something through the market. And if they do that all at once, it's like playing poker and going all in right away. You just tip your hand. And so they have to find a way -- and they use algorithms to do this -- to break up that big thing into a million little transactions. And the magic and the horror of that is that the same math that you use to break up the big thing into a million little things can be used to find a million little things and sew them back together and figure out what's actually happening in the market.

So if you need to have some image of what's happening in the stock market right now, what you can picture is a bunch of algorithms that are basically programmed to hide, and a bunch of algorithms that are programmed to go find them and act. And all of that's great, and it's fine. And that's 70 percent of the United States stock market, 70 percent of the operating system formerly known as your pension, your mortgage.

And what could go wrong? What could go wrong is that a year ago, nine percent of the entire market just disappears in five minutes, and they called it the Flash Crash of 2:45.



Indeed. What could possibly go wrong in the robot powered market?

Peter Feddo is a pragmatic investor who enjoys the interplay of global politics & economics in equity markets.
Read More